Skip to content

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Sep 6, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
rubocop-performance (source, changelog) 1.25.0 -> 1.26.1 age confidence

Release Notes

rubocop/rubocop-performance (rubocop-performance)

v1.26.1

Compare Source

Bug fixes
  • #​517: Fix false positives for Performance/RedundantStringChars when using str.chars[0, 2]. ([@​koic][])
Changes

v1.26.0

Compare Source

Bug fixes
  • #​444: Fix an incorrect autocorrect for Performance/BlockGivenWithExplicitBlock when using Naming/BlockForwarding's autocorrection together. ([@​a-lavis][])
  • #​500: Mark Performance/MapCompact cop as unsafe. ([@​jbpextra][])
  • #​498: Fix Performance/Count cop error on empty selector block. ([@​viralpraxis][])
  • #​504: Fix autocorrection syntax error for Performance/Count with multiline calls. ([@​lovro-bikic][])
Changes
  • #​512: Detect negated conditions like !foo.start_with('bar') && !foo.start_with('baz') with Performance/DoubleStartEndWith. ([@​earlopain][])

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/rubocop-performance-1.x-lockfile branch from 80d9eb1 to 574ca20 Compare September 25, 2025 16:37
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency rubocop-performance to v1.26.0 Update dependency rubocop-performance to v1.26.1 Oct 18, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/rubocop-performance-1.x-lockfile branch from 574ca20 to 010bd1e Compare October 18, 2025 09:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants